Sunday, January 19, 2025

Spare the Murders; kill the innocent

                   

“When Herod realized that he had been outwitted by the Magi, he was furious, and he gave orders to kill all the boys in Bethlehem and its vicinity who were two years old and under, in accordance with the time he had learned from the Magi.” —  Matthew 2:16


To historians, King Herod the Great of Judea is best known for his large-scale building projects throughout Judea. To most Christians, he is remembered only for his “massacre of the innocents” in Bethlehem, as described in Matthew’s gospel. For most Christians, Herod represents the epitome of evil — a man responsible for selfish murder of two-year-old children to preserve his throne. Herod’s slaughter of the innocents is commemorated annually on the church’s calendar on December 28.

On December 23, 2024, President Joe Biden commuted the death sentences of 37 out of 40 murderers on Federal death row. In his official statement, Biden writes

"These commutations are consistent with the moratorium my Administration has imposed [2021on federal executions, in cases other than terrorism and hate-motivated mass murder.

 "Make no mistake: I condemn these murderers, grieve for the victims of their despicable acts, and ache for all the families who have suffered unimaginable and irreparable loss.

 "But guided by my conscience and my experience as a public defender, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Vice President, and now President, I am more convinced than ever that we must stop the use of the death penalty at the federal level. In good conscience, I cannot stand back and let a new [Trump] administration resume executions that I halted."


But if these acts of these murderers were “despicable,” and if the victims’ families “have suffered unimaginable and irreparable loss,” why did he do it? Were they not presumed innocent at trial? Didn’t the juries find the guilt of these murderers beyond a reasonable doubt? Didn’t they have competent lawyers at every stage of their criminal proceedings? Didn’t they have a written charge specifying what crimes they had committed? Were they not allowed to confront their accusers and cross-examine them? Were they not allowed to compel the attendance of their own witnesses? Were they not tried in open court? Were their convictions not affirmed on their appeals? If they are indeed guilty of “despicable,” and if the victims’ families “have suffered unimaginable and irreparable loss,” why did he do it?

Now, which of any of these rights did Biden’s 37 murderers afford their victims? Did they provide they with free attorneys? Proof beyond reasonable doubt? Etc.?

Biden claims to have been “guided by his conscience.” But he also states he did it to thwart the incoming administration: “I cannot stand back and let a new [Trump] administration resume executions that I halted."

But if the death penalty is “immoral” or it was indeed a matter of “conscience,” why did Biden not commute the death sentences of the Tree of Life Synagogue shooter, the Charleston, S.C. church shooter, or the Boston Marathon bomber? Is Biden claiming that their murders were somehow more “despicable,” and/or that the victims’ families “have suffered more unimaginable and irreparable loss?

And if imposition of the “death penalty” is “immoral,” even in “despicable” cases of murder, and if indeed Mr. Biden’s commutations were compelled by his Catholic conscience, where has his conscience been all these years when it comes to abortion and the slaughter of entirely innocent babies in the wombs of their mothers? Were the fetuses given free attorneys? An indictment setting out the crime they had committed? A public trial? A presumption of innocence? Proof beyond reasonable doubt as to a crime they had committed that would justify their being sentenced to death? Or has he no conscience when it comes to killing innocent unborn babies?

There is something hopelessly muddled at Biden’s core which allows him to behave like King Herod when it comes to slaughtering innocent fetal life, while at the same time succoring “despicable” murderers.

 First  Published in the Moline Dispatch and Rock Island Argus on January 19, 2025.                                                                                        Copyright 2025, John Donald O'Shea

Saturday, January 4, 2025

Enough “lawfare;” it’s time to govern


President Biden has pardoned his son, Hunter. The pardon applies to all offenses against the U.S. that Hunter Biden "has committed or may have committed" from Jan. 1, 2014 to Dec. 1, 2024.

In doing so, President Biden broke a pledge he made on June 13, 2024. Biden, while speaking at the G7 Summit in Italy, said he would not pardon or commute his son, Hunter’s, Federal gun charge: "I said I abide by the jury decision. I will do that. And I will not pardon him."

To be honest, I’m glad President Biden pardoned his son following his plea of guilty. Now, I hope that President Biden pardons himself.

Joe Biden is too old to ever run for President again. And in closing the mishandling of “classified documents case” against Joe Biden, Special Counsel Robert Hur, gave as his reason for not prosecuting, that President Biden would be difficult to convict, describing him as a "well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory."

But if President Biden were somehow convicted of “something,” there is no likelihood whatsoever, given his dementia, and his years of honorable service to the country, that he would ever be imprisoned even for a day.

Better to let him fade into the political twilight. Better to let history say what it will about him.

If, however, Joe Biden doesn’t pardon himself, I hope that President Trump pardons him directly upon taking office.

Special Counsel Jack Smith and the DOJ (according to Smith’s “Statements of Expenditures”) spent $35.7M to prosecute President Trump through March 31, 2024. Additional expenditures thru 30 Sept. 2024 are estimated at $14M.

Is it worth an additional $50 million to have the DOJ or a Special Counsel, prosecute President Biden? Or might the Republic have a better use for $50M?

In the period running up to the November 2024 election, the prosecutions against President Trump — especially Special Counsel Smith’s “Classified Documents” case, and Judge Merchan’s bizarre “fraud” case — had the effect of making a “martyr” out of President Trump in the eyes of a majority of the popular voters.

Nearly two thousand years ago, Tertullian, a father of the Christian Church, wrote, "The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church." In saying that, Tertullian meant that the suffering and death of martyrs for their faith actually helps to strengthen the Christian Church.

The Democrats’ “lawfare” against Trump had the unintended consequence of making a martyr of President Trump, and encouraging the voters to vote for a man willing to stand and fight it.

President Trump would be foolish to make the same mistake. It would be counter-productive to make President Biden a martyr, and give the Democrats cause to which to rally.

The Ancient Athenians used large jury trials to decide criminal cases. On one occasion, they empaneled a jury of 5000.

In November the American people formed a jury of 153,000,000. President Trump won the majority. He was vindicated on all charges, and elected as the 47th President.

The people have spoken. They didn’t like “lawfare.” They won’t like it any better if President Biden is the target.


   First  Published in the Moline Dispatch and Rock Island Argus on January 3rd, 2025.                                                                                                                                               Copyright 2025, John Donald O'Shea