The Illinois Reapportionment System. An Absolute Disgrace!

The Illinois General Assembly is the Illinois Legislative body. It consists of a House and a Senate. The House has 118 members elected from 118 "Representative Districts." The Senate has 59 members elected from 59 "Legislative Districts." Each Senate ("legislative") district is divided into two House ("representative") districts


In the year following each Federal decennial census year, the General Assembly is required by law to redistrict both the Legislative and the Representative Districts.


Article IV, Section 3 of The Illinois Constitution of 1970 provides, "Legislative Districts shall be compact, contiguous and substantially equal in population. Representative Districts shall be compact, contiguous, and substantially equal in population."

No similar Illinois provision governs the drawing of Congressional Districts.


The average citizen's definition of "compact" would be roughly akin to the dictionary definition: "closely and neatly packed together; dense ... neatly fitted into a small space.


But in 1895, Illinois legislators and judges "defined" the requirement of "compactness," which was found in the Illinois Constitution of 1870, out of existence. In approving a gerrymandered map drawn by the legislature, the Illinois Supreme Court did so by defining "compactness" in a way to render the term meaningless.


"[W]e are of the opinion that as used in the constitution ... the provision that districts shall be formed of ... compact territory means that [they] ... must be closely united, territorially."


Under that definition two intersecting road could be deemed "compact." Certainly where they intersect, they are "closely united, territorially." But nobody except a political hack in the legislature or on the bench would say that I-80 and I-74 are "compact" because the are "closely united" at their point of intersection.

The drafters of the Illinois Constitution of 1970 were fully aware of what the 1895 Illinois

Supreme Court had done when they reinserted the "compact" requirement into the Constitution of 1970. But they again failed to define "compact!" So the legislature, and the court following its their earlier precedent, have once again ignored the plain meaning of the word — just as they did in 1895.


Nevertheless, the drafters clearly understood the importance of the "compactness" requirement. The Report of the Legislative Committee which proposed the language adopted by the 1970 Convention. It stated:


"Perhaps no standards for drawing legislative district boundaries possess a longer history than the traditional standards of compactness and contiguity. In our present Constitution, these standards are found in both Sections 6 and 7. These standards directly reflect the objective of improving legislative representation through seeking to insure that districts are not gerrymandered."


Presently the Illinois Senate consisted of 41 Democrats and 18 Republicans. The House consists of 73 Democrats and 45 Republicans. Democrats therefore have absolute control of both houses. The Republicans are utterly irrelevant. In Congress, the Democrats hold 13 of 18 seats.


You can see the results of Democrat gerrymandering — with judicial approval. Just look at the 2011 maps. Or look at the new 2021 maps the Democrats have just trotted out. [Of course, the Republican would do the same thing if they had the power.]


Proposed Illinois Senate Map: https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewerll=40.08707930358038%2C88.48127570835499&z=8&mid=1X9lSD13vTX_-4oIyWqstGk8e1VFGJ_i2

Proposed Illinois House Map: https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/1/viewer?mid=1L7I2r4gat9nRWx9wfaizpn7XkA7i1qL4&ll=39.79510521942542%2C-89.50414500000001&z=6



To see what the Illinois Democrats perceive to be "compact," simply look at the present Illinois Congressional map. Can any sane man honestly describe existing Congressional districts 1, 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, as "compact?" This map reduces the redistricting process to crass political cynicism.

https://www.ilga.gov/CongressionalDistrictMaps/Statewide%20View.pdf


As a result of the Democrat gerrymandering in Illinois has been ruled by one-party government for the last 10 years. This map is designed to guarantee that elections are non-competitive. It succeded.

So what's my solution?


As I have no confidence the Illinois Supreme Court will construe the word "compact" as the drafters who wrote our constitutions intended, I see only two possible solutions:


(1) Elect holy angels to draw the map; or (2) amend the Illinois Constitution to provide:

All districts shall be compact — squares, rectangles or triangles. No district shall have more than four sides. All sides shall be straight lines, unless one or more sidesor the sides are the state boundry lines. No arcs, no curves, no squiggles. The only factor, beyond shape, that may be considered in drawing the district's lines is population equality.


Or if the politicians would choke on my solution, they might check out Iowa's. Iowa's Congressional Districts are pretty darn "compact." Copy the Iowa system!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iowa%27s_congressional_districts


In Iowa there are only four Congressional Districts. Indication that the Iowa system works, is that from the 2014 election until the 2018 elections, Republican held 3 of 4 seats. In 2018, Democrats grabbed 3 of 4 seats. In 2020, Republicans 3 of 4 seats back.




Democracy works best when the voters can "throw the bums out"— whether they are Republican bums or Democrat bums.



Copyright 2021, John Donald O'Shea

First Published in the Moline Dispatch and Rock Island Argus on September 14, 2021 under the caption "Level the Playing Field."

Don't Trust Humans to Redistrict Illinois

               "Gerrymander, Joy of Joys, Safe house seats for all our boys!
                        "Gerrymander, we're awfully fond of you, voo, voo, de, doh!"
                                  - To tune of "Rubber Duckie," 
                                          Rock Island County ARC Gridiron Show (1991)

The present system of redistricting Illinois congressional districts and Illinois state legislative districts is cynical political humbug.

What passes for fair-minded redistricting in our state is a counterfeit, inconsistent with the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which provides "No State shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

In 1964, the U. S. Supreme Court in Reynolds v. Sims, held that state legislative districts had to be roughly equal in population. The case rose when voters from Jefferson County, Ala., challenged the redistricting of their state legislature. At the time, Alabama state senators were elected from senatorial districts grossly unequal in population.

One district had 14 times the population of another!

Eight justices voted to strike down the Alabama senate district scheme. Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote that it violated the U. S. Constitutional requirement of "one person, one vote."

He further wrote, "Legislators represent people, not trees or acres. Legislators are elected by voters, not farms or cities or economic interests."

Reynolds v. Sims was not a gerrymandering case. It did not involve drawing congressional districts roughly equal in population but manipulating their boundaries so as to include or exclude Republicans or Democrats, in order to give one party an a electoral advantage.The most extreme example of that would be to create a meandering district that included only persons registered in the Democratic primary, and excluding all persons registered in the the Republican primary -- that is, a district with only Democrats.

The language in the Reynolds v. Sims majority opinion, however, clearly states that "gerrymandering" can be unconstitutional.

"The right to vote can neither be denied outright ... nor destroyed by alteration of ballots ... nor diluted by ballot box stuffing. Obviously included within the right to choose, secured by the Constitution, is the right of qualified voters within a state to cast their ballots and have them counted. ... Racially based gerrymandering, and the conducting of white primaries, both of which result in denying to some citizens their right to vote, have been held to be constitutionally impermissible. And history has seen a continuing expansion of the scope of the right of suffrage in this country. The right to vote freely for the candidate of one's choice is of the essence of a democratic society, and any restrictions on that right strike at the heart of representative government. And the right of suffrage can be denied by a debasement or dilution of the weight of a citizen's vote just as effectively as by wholly prohibiting the free exercise of the franchise."

When districts are intentionally gerrymandered to create districts in which Democrats or Republicans almost are guaranteed victory, the members of the other party have their votes debased. But although the problem may be obvious, the solution may not be.

In the early years when I was on the bench, once a year all Illinois judges were required to attend the Illinois Judicial Conference Educational Seminar. At a luncheon during one such session, the issue of appointing judges (rather than electing them) was discussed by the speaker, an Illinois Supreme Court justice.

The justice expressed skepticism with the argument that "allowing the governor to appoint judges would keep judicial appointments from being political." Instead, he suggested a better way: "Have the appointments made by the Illinois Supreme Court." When the laughter subsided, he finished his remarks, having persuaded nobody.

Recently, the Yes for Independent Maps Coalition has been working to collect about a half a million signatures to get a proposed constitutional amendment on the November ballot that would take redistricting of Illinois legislative districts (not Congressional districts) out of the hands of the legislature.

They correctly believe that Illinois history demonstrates that legislative redistricting equals gerrymandering.

As outlined by the coalition, if approved, any Illinois citizen could apply to join the legislative redistricting commission. A nonpartisan applicant review panel, appointed by the auditor general, would eliminate applicants with conflicts of interest, such as lobbyists or public officials. (Excluding anybody, of course, raises a new set of constitutional questions.)

A lottery then would be used to select commissioners to create a group of two Democrats, two Republicans and three unaffiliated with either party, all proportionally representing Illinois' five judicial districts. The four top legislative leaders in Illinois would each appoint one commissioner from the remaining pool. Commission meetings and records would be open to the public.

The problem I have with this solution to fix Illinois legislative redistricting is that to the extent that there is a human element involved, a remedy is hardly guaranteed. People in politics maneuver, and even finagle to gain partisan advantage.

I would opt for the simplest of all solutions. Create districts as nearly rectangular as possible (taking account of the fact Illinois is not square, but rather is bounded by wandering rivers, etc.) Require these districts be as equal in population as possible. Take account of no other factors. Leave race, creed, color, ethnicity, municipal subdivision boundaries, etc. out of the determination.

Have the district lines drawn by computers, with no directions in the program other than

1. Make them as rectangular as possible, and

2. As nearly equal in population as possible.

If a district is drawn to favor whites, it disfavors everybody else. If it is drawn to favor Latinos, it disfavors Irish guys.

At a minimum, my plan would certainly bar any congressional or legislative district that look like our present 17th Congressional District -- the epitome of a Gerrymander, or perhaps a crocodile, with its mouth open, perched on its keister!

Posted Online:  June 5, 2014, 11:00 pm - Quad-Cities Online
by John Donald O'Shea

Copyright 2014
John Donald O'Shea